Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fager 132's avatar

That's really interesting. The lack of transparency is concerning, though. It's strange that they've made it so hard to answer the questions you raised. But as a pet owner who has sworn to never have another animal because losing them is too devastating, I'd be very interested in longevity treatments if they're ultimately proven effective.

As for the ethical issues, I don't see too many in a canine application. How much someone spends on his animals is his business alone. No one else has the right to interfere with such a personal decision because no one else has the right to the pet owner's money, which is his to spend in accordance with his values. If that means improving the quality of his life by extending his pet's, no one else has the right to interfere with that decision. What's appropriate depends on the human and animal involved *in each case.* There is no fixed answer to that. Not all of the seven cats I've had over the last 23 years would have rated kidney transplants, subtotal colectomies, and femoral head ostectomies, but some have. Now that I'm retired my financial situation would result in a different decision even for the cat who got the new kidney, but just as I have no right to insist that others spend that kind of money on their pets, no one else has the right to demand that I don't spend it on mine.

Is it unethical to allow a dog to age naturally? The existence of a product isn't necessarily a moral imperative to use it. It's never been unethical to let a pet age naturally if its aging is handled with kindness, empathy, and a sense of responsibility. People recognize that allowing and prolonging an animal's discomfort, pain, and limited mobility at some point *is* unethical, and opt for euthanasia or urge the owner to opt for it.

If a pet's life can be extended without subjecting it to more age-related discomfort and pain, and if the value of its companionship is worth more to the owner than the money, then his decision to add value to his life by using something like IGF inhibitors is rational. The whole point of money is to let us both achieve our values and preserve the things that bring value to our lives.

Expand full comment
Based If True's avatar

I find it interesting how extremely tall humans also have a problem with a quicker degradation of their life spans. I'm not sure how the data correlates from humans to dogs but do they share a lot of the same reasons for their lower life spans that taller people do?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts